Declode
A course-commerce platform directed from written specification through a verification-heavy build.
- Claim 011 source
The implementation was directed from written specification over four days and totals about 41,000 lines.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
- Claim 021 source
The audited repository contains 374 automated tests.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
- Claim 031 source
The product scope includes role-based access, payments, and signed video delivery.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
Read the claim. Check the record.
Each material statement points to the source class used to support it. No unsupported outcome is promoted into the case.
- 01
The implementation was directed from written specification over four days and totals about 41,000 lines.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
- 02
The audited repository contains 374 automated tests.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
- 03
The product scope includes role-based access, payments, and signed video delivery.
- Implementation size, test count, delivery window, and product scopeCode audit · 2026-07-31
Turn the specification into a delivery contract
The build started with a written product specification and used it as the reference for agent direction, review, and acceptance.
Build the checks with the product
The evidence is the implementation and its test suite, not a claim that rapid generation made review unnecessary.
What this case does not prove
Honest limits are part of the engineering record, not a note to hide below it.
- 01The external release destination is intentionally omitted until its current status is verified.
- 02No customer outcome metric is available for publication.